Gary in SoFL - 1 week ago |
Re: 718 N/A 6 cylinders......sounds good! db997S - 1 week ago |
Re: 718 N/A 6 cylinders......sounds good! db997S - 1 week ago |
MikenOH - 1 week ago |
Quote
Guenter in Ontario
It depends on the test cycle used. It could be that in the European test that the 718 got slightly better mileage.
It's a different story with the Canadian Test. I compared the consumption of the 981 and 718. On the Canadian test cycle, the 981 actually uses less gas. Here's the comparison in MPG.
]
What surprised me, was that the biggest drop in mileage was on the highway. I would have expected the 4 cylinder to do better there. But, those are the official Canadian test numbers.
Re: 718 N/A 6 cylinders......sounds good! paulofto - Saturday at 8:11:15 am |
Re: 718 N/A 6 cylinders......sounds good! Guenter in Ontario - Saturday at 9:01:36 am |
Quote
paulofto
Guenter, I'm assuming those are imperial gallons not US gallons?
Re: 718 N/A 6 cylinders......sounds good! paulofto - Sunday at 9:13:24 am |
Re: 718 N/A 6 cylinders......sounds good! Guenter in Ontario - Sunday at 10:54:27 am |
Quote
paulofto
Well that gives you an idea how old I am. I have an old 'L/100KM to MPG' (Imperial Gallons) conversion chart that the Canadian government gave out back in 1975 when we went metric. Somehow it stuck around in my desk. I really have to go through that desk!
Re: 718 N/A 6 cylinders......sounds good! paulofto - Sunday at 8:30:07 pm |
![]() Gary in SoFL - Monday at 1:02:46 pm |
![]() Gary in SoFL - Monday at 1:04:35 pm |