Change HistoryDiscussion of Boxsters and other Porsches |  |  |
|
Buying through this link, gets PB a donation. |
Expect the best, and accept no substitute. |
 | |
Message: No. See below
Changed By: grant
Change Date: June 07, 2014 07:19PM
No. See below
Change Date: June 07, 2014 07:19PM
No. See below
[i]You admit the engine sees lots of WOT and 6K RPMs for extended periods. What did you expect?
I have to point out you are using 10w-40 oil which is not an approved oil.[/i]
Nope. Same oil, same track use, other car, perfect results. So when the same oil and use result in totally different results, and the results are consistent within vehicles but not between vehicles, blaming the oil is logically flawed. And let's not get into the silliness of the "not approved" stuff.
The rest of your email I wont copy since it all derives from the same flawed thesis. same answer - doesn't align with the facts.
Nope. Same oil, same track use, other car, perfect results (repeated). So when the same oil and use result in totally different results, and the results are consistent within vehicles but not between vehicles, blaming the oil is logically flawed. And let's not get into the silliness of the "not approved" stuff.
The rest of your email I won't copy since it all derives from the same flawed thesis. same answer - doesn't align with the facts.
That's why its confusing.
I expected more thought and help, not a rant. frankly. You are, and have proven yourself , better than this drivel.
My biggest gripe is that this takes a legitimate discussion off in an argumentative, pointless, rat-hole - making your post worse than useless - it has a net negative value to me.
Grant
I have to point out you are using 10w-40 oil which is not an approved oil.[/i]
Nope. Same oil, same track use, other car, perfect results. So when the same oil and use result in totally different results, and the results are consistent within vehicles but not between vehicles, blaming the oil is logically flawed. And let's not get into the silliness of the "not approved" stuff.
The rest of your email I wont copy since it all derives from the same flawed thesis. same answer - doesn't align with the facts.
Nope. Same oil, same track use, other car, perfect results (repeated). So when the same oil and use result in totally different results, and the results are consistent within vehicles but not between vehicles, blaming the oil is logically flawed. And let's not get into the silliness of the "not approved" stuff.
The rest of your email I won't copy since it all derives from the same flawed thesis. same answer - doesn't align with the facts.
That's why its confusing.
I expected more thought and help, not a rant. frankly. You are, and have proven yourself , better than this drivel.
My biggest gripe is that this takes a legitimate discussion off in an argumentative, pointless, rat-hole - making your post worse than useless - it has a net negative value to me.
Grant
Changed By: grant
Change Date: June 07, 2014 07:09PM
No. See below
Change Date: June 07, 2014 07:09PM
No. See below
[i]You admit the engine sees lots of WOT and 6K RPMs for extended periods. What did you expect?
I have to point out you are using 10w-40 oil which is not an approved oil.[/i]
Nope. Same oil, same track use, other car, perfect results. So when the same oil and use result in totally different results, and the results are consistent within vehicles but not between vehicles, blaming the oil is logically flawed. And let's not get into the silliness of the "not approved" stuff.
The rest of your email I wont copy since it all derives from the same flawed thesis. same answer - doesn't align with the facts.
That's why its confusing.
i I expected more thought and help, not a rant. frankly.
You have proven yourself better than this drivel.
Grant
I have to point out you are using 10w-40 oil which is not an approved oil.[/i]
Nope. Same oil, same track use, other car, perfect results. So when the same oil and use result in totally different results, and the results are consistent within vehicles but not between vehicles, blaming the oil is logically flawed. And let's not get into the silliness of the "not approved" stuff.
The rest of your email I wont copy since it all derives from the same flawed thesis. same answer - doesn't align with the facts.
That's why its confusing.
i I expected more thought and help, not a rant. frankly.
You have proven yourself better than this drivel.
Grant
Original Message
Author: grantDate: June 07, 2014 07:08PM
No. See below
[i]You admit the engine sees lots of WOT and 6K RPMs for extended periods. What did you expect?
I have to point out you are using 10w-40 oil which is not an approved oil.[/i]
Nope. Same oil, same track use, other car, perfect results. So when the same oil and use result in totally different results, and the results are consistent within vehicles but not between vehicles, blaming the oil is logically flawed. And let's not get into the silliness of the "not approved" stuff.
The rest of your email I wont copy since it all derives from the same flawed thesis. same answer - doesn't align with the facts.
That's why its confusing.
i expected more thought and help, not a rant. frankly.
Grant
I have to point out you are using 10w-40 oil which is not an approved oil.[/i]
Nope. Same oil, same track use, other car, perfect results. So when the same oil and use result in totally different results, and the results are consistent within vehicles but not between vehicles, blaming the oil is logically flawed. And let's not get into the silliness of the "not approved" stuff.
The rest of your email I wont copy since it all derives from the same flawed thesis. same answer - doesn't align with the facts.
That's why its confusing.
i expected more thought and help, not a rant. frankly.
Grant