Changed By: Laz Change Date: April 18, 2015 09:34PM The slightest bit of suburban-semirural driving and my 981S's mileage gets clobbered.
Steady long distance driving at about 75 mph through the Great Plains gives me ≈ 34-35 mpg.* Driving in my area, definitely [i]not[/i] "City" and it drops to 15-16. About a year ago I tried following the upshift indicator, but the thing will have you in 6th at 40 mph, which is ridiculous. I don't think the Sport throttle setting makes much difference mpg-wise. As I mentioned some time ago, because it's like gaining about a quarter of a gear down, I found myself upshifting sooner because the [i]initial[/i] response is somewhat comparable, so the aggressive mapping is offset by my earlier upshifting. * What amazes me is that's about, or even an mpg or two more than what my base 01 could get, and the 981S Boxster S has a nominal 98 more horsepower.
Original Message
Author: Laz Date: April 18, 2015 09:20PM The slightest bit of suburban-semirural driving and my 981S's mileage gets clobbered.
Steady long distance driving at about 75 mph through the Great Plains gives me ≈ 34-35 mpg.* Driving in my area, definitely [i]not[/i] "City" and it drops to 15-16. About a year ago I tried following the upshift indicator, but the thing will have you in 6th at 40 mph, which is ridiculous. I don't think the Sport throttle setting makes much difference mpg-wise. As I mentioned some time ago, because it's like gaining about a quarter of a gear down, I found myself upshifting sooner because the [i]initial[/i] response is somewhat comparable, so the aggressive mapping is offset by my earlier upshifting. * What amazes me is that's about, or even an mpg or two more than what my base 01 could get, and the 981S has a nominal 98 more horsepower.