Changed By: Boxsterra Change Date: February 12, 2016 09:05AM Thanks, guys. It is impressive from a #s standpoint.
The numbers do imply that from an available power & torque standpoint that the 718 blows away the 981. Much more torque is available at lower revs. I'd love to know how it stacks up in practical application.
Here are a few (approximate) data points from those graphs. The 718 is way ahead everywhere except high-rev torque, which drops off much earlier.
[b]1500 rpm: [/b] 981: 85 hp / 155 lb-ft 718: 118 hp / 205 lb-ft
2000 rpm: 718: [color=#009900]118 hp / 205 lb-ft[/color]
[b]2000 rpm:[/b] 981: 85 hp / 200 lb-ft 718: 167 hp / 309 lb-ft
4000 rpm: 718: [color=#009900]167 hp / 309 lb-ft[/color]
[b]4000 rpm:[/b] 981: 188 hp / 230 lb-ft 718: 275 hp / 309 lb-ft
6000 rpm 981: 300 hp / 266 lb-ft 718: 369 hp / 255 lb-ft718: [color=#009900]275 hp / 309 lb-ft[/color]
Author: Boxsterra Date: February 12, 2016 09:04AM Thanks, guys. It is impressive from a #s standpoint.
The numbers do imply that from an available power & torque standpoint that the 718 blows away the 981. Much more torque is available at lower revs. I'd love to know how it stacks up in practical application.
Here are a few (approximate) data points from those graphs. The 718 is way ahead everywhere except high-rev torque, which drops off much earlier.
1500 rpm: 981: 85 hp / 155 lb-ft 718: 118 hp / 205 lb-ft
2000 rpm: 981: 85 hp / 200 lb-ft 718: 167 hp / 309 lb-ft
4000 rpm: 981: 188 hp / 230 lb-ft 718: 275 hp / 309 lb-ft
6000 rpm 981: 300 hp / 266 lb-ft 718: 369 hp / 255 lb-ft