Home
>
Main Forum
>
Topic Re: More info on the new 4 cylinder boxer engine - still under development |
More info on the new 4 cylinder boxer engine - still under development Guenter in Ontario - Tuesday, 6 September, 2011, at 8:34:02 pm |
Re: More info on the new 4 cylinder boxer engine - still under development Alcantera - Tuesday, 6 September, 2011, at 10:37:17 pm |
Re: More info on the new 4 cylinder boxer engine - still under development Guenter in Ontario - Tuesday, 6 September, 2011, at 11:12:17 pm |
Quote
Alcantera
Goodbye symphony in flat six, Hello 4 part harmony???............Nah
At 380hp for the 2.5, I'm cylinder-agnostic *NM* Charlie (Sacramento CA) - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 12:53:05 am |
Re: At 380hp for the 2.5, I'm cylinder-agnostic frogster - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 12:57:16 am |
That's was the problem with the 4 banger in the Honda S2000. All the fun at the top end *NM* db997S - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 8:27:35 am |
I'll take one, I don't see the problem Bobtesa - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 8:58:12 am |
Re: I'll take one, I don't see the problem frogster - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 11:04:16 am |
Quote
Bobtesa
As for getting the power at high rpms, I knew that would be the down fall of the Honda 2000. A great little car, but not for every day drivers. I drove a friend's and he just about s--t when I took 2nd up to 4k before shifting. He shifted at 2,500!
Re: I'll take one, I don't see the problem Leor ('09S, North of Boston) - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 8:10:08 pm |
This is a turbo engine folks - that can be tuned for TONS of torque down low (albeit with lag) grant - Tuesday, 13 September, 2011, at 2:30:57 pm |
Although I'm a "No Substitute" adherent, Laz - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 11:28:14 am |
I traded my RX-8 for my '01S . The torque is where it's at. IFlyLow - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 2:00:36 pm |
So I'm guessing that no one here has ever owned a WRX? 986rgt - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 6:36:06 pm |
Re: More info on the new 4 cylinder boxer engine - still under development Alcantera - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 8:46:23 am |
BMW looks to be going in ther same direction, with significantly less HP for now.. MikenOH - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 3:27:41 pm |
Gotta get to 54.5 MPG, on average, by the 2025 model year... *NM* Gary in SoFL - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 3:46:33 pm |
No sweat with a one liter, twin turbo flat two *NM* Guenter in Ontario - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 3:53:09 pm |
Re: No sweat with a one liter, twin turbo flat two -- Actually, it would be sweat paulwdenton - Tuesday, 13 September, 2011, at 8:58:11 am |
Anyone know the methodology on how they came up with the 54.5MPG figure by 2025 and not 40MPG or 100 *NM* MikenOH - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 4:04:11 pm |
darts *NM* old timer - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 4:07:19 pm |
It is calculated based on four factors Boxsterra - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 4:30:28 pm |
Do you have a link to that engineering feasibility evaluation *NM* Gary in SoFL - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 6:12:19 pm |
An outdated but informative link. MikenOH - Wednesday, 7 September, 2011, at 8:58:57 pm |
Very interesting....thanks! *NM* Gary in SoFL - Thursday, 8 September, 2011, at 12:05:14 pm |
Re: Very interesting....thanks! old timer - Thursday, 8 September, 2011, at 12:53:04 pm |
Re: Very interesting....thanks! Gary in SoFL - Thursday, 8 September, 2011, at 3:20:53 pm |
Re: Very interesting....thanks! MikenOH - Friday, 9 September, 2011, at 9:34:36 am |
Hmmm, how about a new-era 912 with a 380 HP 2.5L turbo flat-4? MarkinMD - Tuesday, 13 September, 2011, at 1:28:22 pm |