Home
>
Main Forum
>
Topic Re: New video of the IMS bearing as it sits in the car.... |
New video of the IMS bearing as it sits in the car.... Pedro (Odessa, FL) - Wednesday, 6 November, 2013, at 5:19:17 pm |
Re: New video of the IMS bearing as it sits in the car.... Crooster - Wednesday, 6 November, 2013, at 7:47:39 pm |
Nice shirt! *NM* Lawdevil & CURVN8R - Wednesday, 6 November, 2013, at 8:09:19 pm |
Foaming? Bruce In Philly (2000 S Boxster, now '09 C2S) - Thursday, 7 November, 2013, at 11:36:43 am |
The AOS is responsible for removing oil vapor from the crankcase fumes before the fumes... MarcW - Friday, 8 November, 2013, at 1:19:27 pm |
Quote
Bruce In Philly (2000 S Boxster, now '09 C2S)
Could an open system like this cause foaming? If it did, then that could cause trouble as bubbles are bad for lubrication elsewhere in the engine. Isn't that a function of the AOS to remove foam?
I know oil is supposed to have anti-foaming agents in them, but getting rid of bubbles is so important, the engine must ensure no bubbles.
Do I have this all correct?
Peace
Bruce in Philly
Re: New video of the IMS bearing as it sits in the car.... 986rgt - Thursday, 7 November, 2013, at 2:13:46 pm |
Ok, I guess disregard most of my last post Pedro. 986rgt - Thursday, 7 November, 2013, at 5:19:21 pm |
Re: New video of the IMS bearing as it sits in the car.... Guenter in Ontario - Thursday, 7 November, 2013, at 6:06:02 pm |
Re: New video of the IMS bearing as it sits in the car.... San Rensho - Thursday, 7 November, 2013, at 9:37:08 pm |
Re: New video of the IMS bearing as it sits in the car.... Ed B - Friday, 8 November, 2013, at 9:50:36 am |
So, is the bearing or the seal? Bobtesa - Sunday, 10 November, 2013, at 3:05:34 pm |
Confusion here grant - Monday, 11 November, 2013, at 8:23:13 am |
Re: Pedro, does your DOF work best with or without a seal? Pedro (Odessa, FL) - Monday, 11 November, 2013, at 12:14:23 pm |
and withou test dsts, i agree eith the followin summary: grant - Tuesday, 12 November, 2013, at 1:36:46 am |
Re: and withou test dsts, i agree eith the followin summary: thom4782 - Monday, 18 November, 2013, at 9:16:38 am |
The single-row bearings... Pedro (Odessa, FL) - Monday, 18 November, 2013, at 9:58:50 am |
Quote
thom4782
So how do you explain why single row bearings fail at least 8 times more frequently than dual row bearings when they have the same engineering design and differ only in their load carrying capacity?
"... differ only in their load carrying capacity..." *NM* Laz - Monday, 18 November, 2013, at 10:13:59 am |
Easy. A bigger bearing, with lower load on each race, can survive with inadequate lubrucation longer grant - Monday, 18 November, 2013, at 6:14:55 pm |
Re: and withou test dsts, i agree eith the followin summary: thom4782 - Monday, 18 November, 2013, at 10:34:01 pm |
He answered your question above Boxsterra - Monday, 18 November, 2013, at 11:03:35 pm |
Not intrinsically weak, but differing relative strengths. (Single/double; alloys/ceramic; etc.) *NM* Laz - Monday, 18 November, 2013, at 10:15:37 am |
Re: New video of the IMS bearing as it sits in the car.... Jaay - Sunday, 10 November, 2013, at 9:04:27 pm |