That's amazing. Great find. *NM* Laz - 8 years ago |
Re: Finally +1 more Guenter in Ontario - 8 years ago |
i don't find the sound of the 718 very compelling frogster - 8 years ago |
Oh, we'll grow to like it, just like water-cooling, etc. Laz - 8 years ago |
Want to bet? *NM* Gary in SoFL - 8 years ago |
Re: I'd love to have a 66 912 again (mint condition!) even with 0-60 11+ secs, and its four-banger. Guenter in Ontario - 8 years ago |
Quote
Laz
It was remarkable that the motor was a couple cc's smaller than the one in my sister's bug, yet produced twice the horsepower.
HYPOID? NM Tcar - 8 years ago |
Re: HYPOID? (edited) Laz - 8 years ago |
Re: i don't find the sound of the 718 very compelling decay - 8 years ago |
Quote
frogster
i just don't get excited by the sound of the new boxster. i think it's a sharp looking car but i'm not sure i would buy one. the thought, and sound, of a four cylinder sitting just behind me does not excite me.
i remember one of the things that i liked best about my 2000 986S was the intake sound after I de-snorkled it. oh was it ever sweet. i can't imagine you could get anything like that out of a four cylinder turbo.
i need to see, and hear, one of these new cars in the flesh.
Re: Finally MarcW - 8 years ago |
Another comparison Guenter in Ontario - 8 years ago |
Best demonstration of the contrast yet. 718 sounds hollow, and yes, hopped-up Bug-like. Laz - 8 years ago |
I didn't observe any difference... Roger987 - 8 years ago |