Home
>
Main Forum
>
Topic Hope you're studying the PDK manual *NM* |
Saw my car at the dealership today. Laz - Monday, 25 June, 2012, at 10:36:37 pm |
CONGRATS! Mine is to be built Friday. *NM* Lawdevil & CURVN8R - Monday, 25 June, 2012, at 10:44:51 pm |
So why didn't they let you drive it off? Gary in SoFL - Tuesday, 26 June, 2012, at 11:05:26 am |
Re: So why didn't they let you drive it off? Laz - Tuesday, 26 June, 2012, at 11:15:22 am |
Hope you're studying the PDK manual *NM* Gary in SoFL - Tuesday, 26 June, 2012, at 11:38:43 am |
I already know everything I need to about it. *NM* Laz - Tuesday, 26 June, 2012, at 11:57:06 am |
Laz, sounds as though you have a bad case of buyer's remorse. *NM* Roger987 - Monday, 25 June, 2012, at 11:28:54 pm |
Terrible, just terrible. Should've manned up, let my beard grow a few days and bought a Camry. *NM* Laz - Tuesday, 26 June, 2012, at 8:30:09 am |
Don't bother with the pictures - probably too fuzzy from the shaking. Guenter in Ontario - Tuesday, 26 June, 2012, at 8:36:05 am |
Re: Don't bother with the pictures - probably too fuzzy from the shaking. Laz - Tuesday, 26 June, 2012, at 9:28:47 am |
Re: Don't bother with the pictures - probably too fuzzy from the shaking. jwdbox - Tuesday, 26 June, 2012, at 12:23:55 pm |
Laz, I know what you mean, I have several rolls of Ektar 100 in my wine cooler that I keep just for my serious car shoots.Quote
Laz
Actually, I'm "quite" happy with the color. As I said, I was awestruck by the color combination and the car overall.
Concerning my garage: it's quite rustic, to say the least. None of that high tech tiling or vintage Targa Florio posters on the walls. First order of business would be repaving the beat up 160 foot driveway, but that's not in this year's budget... wonder why?
Shaking or not, using a 35mm (mild wide angle) with a high enough shutter speed will be my configuration of choice. I miss Kodachrome...
Re: Don't bother with the pictures - probably too fuzzy from the shaking. Laz - Tuesday, 26 June, 2012, at 12:43:46 pm |
Re: Don't bother with the pictures - probably too fuzzy from the shaking. jwdbox - Tuesday, 26 June, 2012, at 3:22:02 pm |
IMHO to a great degree back then photographs were based more on the eye of the photographer, the quality of the equipment and far less to post shot manipulation (excepting the occasional 'artsy' Sabatier or other dark room effect applied).Quote
Laz
Kodak used to have a back-lit sign on Times Square that featured an actual photo print blow-up from Kodachrome 25. The thing was at least 30 feet wide, and the colors were saturated and the level of detail was amazing. High resolution digital? Phooey.